|     |  

International Publications

1. Cakmak O, Buyuklu F, Kaya KS, Babakurban ST, Boghari A, Tunali S. Anatomical Insights on the Cervical Nerve for Contemperary Face and Neck Lifting Techniques: A Cadaveric Study.  Aesthet Surg J, 2024 (in press).

 

2. Boghari A, Cakmak O. Deep Neck Contouring: Indications and Technique. Facial Plastic Surgery, 2024 (in press).

 

3. Cakmak O, Buyuklu F, Kolar M, Whitehead DEJ, Gezer E, Tunalı S. Deep Neck Contouring with a Focus on Submandibular Gland Vascularity: A Cadaver Study. Aesthet Surg J. 2023; 43(8): 805-816. (Commentary by Mc Clearly SP and Roostaeian J, 817-819)

 

4. Cakmak O, I Emre. Modified Composite Plane Facelift with Extended Neck Dissection. Facial Plast Surg. 2022 Dec;38(6):584-592.

 

5. Kaya KS, Cakmak O. Facelift Techniques: An Overview. Facial Plast Surg. 2022 Dec;38(6):540-545.

 

 6. Whitehead DEJ, Cakmak O. Face and Neck Lift Options in Patients of Ethnic Descent. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2022: 30(4);489-498.

 

7. Cakmak O. Facelift. Facial Plast Surg. 2022 Dec;38(6):539.

 

8.  Cakmak O, Review of Dr. Andrew Jacono's Book: The Art and Science of Extended Deep Plane Face Lifting and Complementary Facial Rejuvenation Procedures. Facial Plast Surg. 2022 Apr;38(2):218.

 

 9. Cakmak O. Commentary on: Effect of platelet-derived concentrated growth factor on single-layer, multi-layer, and crushed onlay cartilage grafts. Aesthet Surg J. 2021;12; 41(5): 548-549.

10. Cakmak O, Emre IE. An Update on Subciliary Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty.  Facial Plast Surg. 2021; 37(2):198-204.

 

11. Cakmak O, Emre IE. Surgical anatomy for extended facelift techniques, Facial Plast Surg. 2020; 36(3):309-316.

 

12. Cakmak O. Clarification regarding the modified finger-assisted malar elevation (FAME) technique. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 2019; 39 (5), 161-162 (Response by Brian Mendelson, 163-164).

 

 13. Cakmak O, Over-cropped figure obstructing the modified finger-assisted elevation technique, Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2019; 39(10): NP440.

 

14. Cakmak O, Ozucer B, Aztekin M, Ozkurt FE, Al-Salman R, Emre IE. Modified composite-flap facelift combined with FAME: A cadaver study. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 2018; 38 (12), 1269-1279. (Commentary by Marc Mani, 1280-1283, Commentary by Brian Mendelson, 1284-1288)

 

15. Cakmak O, Emre IE, Ozucer B. Surgical approach to the thick nasolabial folds, jowls and heavy neck. Facial Plastic Surgery. 2018; 34(1): 59-65.

 

 16. Cakmak O, Emre IE, Ozkurt FE. Addressing saddle nose deformity-Reply. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016; 18(1):75-76.

 

17. Cakmak O, Emre IE, Ozkurt FE. Identifying septal support reconstructions for saddle nose deformity: The Cakmak Algorithm. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015; 17 (6): 433-439 (Commentary by Rui Xavier, 2016 Jan-Feb;18(1):75).

 

18. Cakmak O, Babakurban ST, Akkuzu HG, Bilgi S, Ovalı E, Kongur M, Altintas H, Yilmaz B, Bilezikçi B, Yilmaz Celik Z, Yakicier MC, Sahin FI. Injectable tissue engineered cartilage using commercially available fibrin glue. Laryngoscope. 2013;123 (12): 2986-92.

 

19. Emre IE, Cakmak O. Aging face, an overview – Aetiology, assessment, and management. The Otorhinolaryngologist, 2013; 6(3): 160–166.

 

20. Cakmak O, Turkoz HK, Polat S, Serin GM, Hizal E, Tanyeri H. Histopathologic response to highly purified liquid silicone injected intradermally in rat’s skin. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011; 35(4):538-44.

 

21. Hizal E, Buyuklu F, Ozer O, Cakmak O. Effects of different levels of crushing on the viability of rabbit costal and nasal septal cartilages. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128(5): 1045-51.

 

22. Altintas H, Odemis M, Bilgi S, Cakmak O. Long-term complications of polyethylene glycol injection to the face. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012; 36 (2): 427-30.

 

23. Buyuklu F, Akdogan MV, Ozer C, Cakmak O. Growth characteristics and clinical manifestations of the paranasal sinus osteomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 145 (2), 319-323.

 

24. Buyuklu F, Hizal E, Yilmaz Z, Sahin FI, Cakmak O. Viability of crushed human auricular and costal chondrocytes in cell culture. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg, 2011; 39(3):221-5.

 

25. Cakmak O, Altintas H. A classification for degree of crushed cartilage. Arch Facial Plastic Surg, 2010, 12 (6), 435-436.

 

26. Babakurban ST, Cakmak O, Kendir S, Elhan A, Quatela VC. Temporal branches of the facial nerve and their relationships with the fascial layers. Arch Facial Plastic Surg, 2010, 12 (1), 16-23.

 

27. Ulu EM, Cakmak O, Dönmez FY, Büyüklü F, Cevik B, Akdoğan V, Coşkun M. Sinonasal schwannoma of the middle turbinate. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2010 Jun; 16 (2): 129-31.

 

28. Buyuklu F, Cakmak O, Hızal E, Dönmez FY. Outfracture of the Inferior Turbinate: A Com-puted Tomography Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009, 123(6):1704-1709.

 

29. Cakmak O. Crushed cartilage grafts. Arch Facial Plast Surg, 2008, 10 (6), 428.

 

30. Tarhan E, Cakmak O, Ozdemir B, Akdogan V, Suren D. Comparison of AlloDerm, fat, fascia, cartilage and dermal grafts in rabbits. Arch Facial Plastic Surg, 2008, 10 (3): 187-193.

 

31. Cagici A, Cakmak O, Bal N, Yavuz H, Tuncer İ. Effects of different suture materials on carti-lage reshaping. Arch Facial Plastic Surg, 2008, 10 (2): 124-129.

 

32. Topal O, Erbek SS, Kıyıcı H, Cakmak O. Expression of metalloproteinases MM-2 and MM-9 in antrochoanal polyps. Am J Rhinol. 2008, 22 (4): 124-129.

 

33. Erbek SS, Serefhanoglu K, Erbek S, Demirbilek M, Can F, Tarhan E, Turan H, Cakmak O. Clinical subgroups and antifungal susceptibilities in fungal culture-positive patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008, 265(7):775-80.

 

34. Cakmak O, Buyuklu F. Crushed cartilage grafts for concealing irregularities in rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plastic Surg, 2007, 9 (5): 322-327.

 

35. Cankurtaran M, Celik H, Coskun M, Hizal E, Cakmak O. Acoustic Rhinometry in Healthy Humans: Accuracy of area estimates, and ability to quantify certain anatomical structures in the nasal cavity. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 2007, 116 (12), 906-916.

 

36. Erbek SS, Yurtcu E, Erbek S, Atac FB, Sahin FI, Cakmak O. Proinflammatory cytokine single nucleotide polymorphisms in nasal polyposis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133:705-709.

 

37. Erbek SS, Erbek S, Topal O, Cakmak O. The role of allergy in the severity of nasal polyposis. Am J Rhinol. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(6):686-90.

 

38. Buyuklu F, Cakmak O. Histological analysis of human diced cartilage grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jul;120(1):348-9.

 

39. Ada S, Seckin D, Tarhan E, Buyuklu F, Cakmak O, Arikan U. Eosinophilic ulcer of the tongue. Australas J Dermatol. 2007 Nov 48 (4), 248-50.

 

40. Erkan AN, Cakmak O, Kocer NE, Yilmaz I. Effects of fibrin glue on nasal septal tissues. Laryngoscope. 2007 Mar;117(3):491-6.

 

41. Turkoglu S, Cakmak O, Kaya S, Colak A, Demirhan B. Pathology quiz case 2: Molluscum con-tagiosum. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Feb;133(2):199, 201.

 

42. Erbek S, Erbek SS, Tosun E, Cakmak O. A rare case of sarcoidosis involving the middle turbi-nates: an incidental diagnosis. Diagn Pathol. 2006 Nov 21;1:44.

 

43. Cakmak O, Buyuklu F. Survival of diced cartilage grafts: an experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Dec;118(7):1658; author reply 1658-9.

 

44. Cagici CA, Ozer C, Yilmaz İ, Bolat TA, Cakmak O. Solitary polyps of the uncinate process. Ear Nose Throat J. 2007 Feb;86(2):4-6.

 

45. Erkan AN, Cakmak O, Kayaselcuk F, Koksal F, Ozluoğlu LN. Bilateral parotid tuberculosis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 263(5):487-489.

 

46. Cakmak O, Buyuklu F, Yilmaz Z, Sahin FI, Tarhan E, Ozluoglu LN. Viability of cultured human nasal septum chondrocytes after crushing. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005 7(6):406-9,

 

47. Erkan AN, Cakmak O, Bal N. Frontochoanal Polyp: Case Report. ENT J. 2009, 88(5):E1.

 

48. Cagici CA, Cakmak O, Hurcan C, Tercan F. Three-slice computerized tomography for the diag-nosis and follow-up of rhinosinusitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 262(9):744-50.

 

49. Cakmak O, Bircan S, Buyuklu F, Tuncer I, dal T, Ozluoglu LN. Viability of crushed and diced cartilage grafts: a study in rabbits. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005 7(1):21-6.

 

50. Cakmak O, Celik H, Cankurtaran M, Ozluoglu LN. Effects of anatomical variations of the nasal cavity on acoustic rhinometry measurements: a model study. Am J Rhinol. 2005 May-Jun;19(3):262-8.

 

51. Tarhan E, Coskun M, Cakmak O, Celik H, Cankurtaran M. Acoustic rhinometry in hu-mans:accuracy of nasal passage area estimates, and ability to quantify paranasal sinus volume and osteum size. J Appl Physiol. 2005 99:616-623.

 

52. Cagici CA, Karabay g, Yilmazer C, Gencay S, Cakmak O. Electron microscopy findings in the nasal mucosa of a patient with stenosis of the nasal vestibule. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Mar;69(3):399-405.

 

53. Cakmak O, Tarhan E, Coskun M, Cankurtaran M, Çelik H. Acoustic Rhinometry: Accuracy and Ability to Detect Changes in Passage Area at Different Locations in the Nasal Cavity. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005 114(12):949-57.

 

54. Buyuklu F, Tarhan E, Cakmak O, Ozgirgin N, Arikan U. Isolated fibrous dysplasia of the sphenoid sinus. Rhinology 2005 43, 152-5.

 

55. Celik H, Cankurtaran M, Cakmak O. Acoustic rhinometry measurements in stepped-tube models of the nasal cavity. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 49: 371-386, 2004.

 

56. Akkuzu G, Aydin E, Cakmak O, Akkuzu B, Ozluoglu LN. Pathology quiz case 1. Atypical fibroxanthoma of the auricle. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 130: 238-240, 2004.

 

57. Yılmaz I, Akkuzu B, Cakmak O, Ozluoglu LN. Misoprostol in the treatment of tinnitus: a double-blind study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 130: 604-10.

 

58. Yilmaz I, Cakmak O, Ozgirgin N, Boyvat F, Demirhan B. Complete fistula of the second bran-chial cleft: case report of catheter-aided total excision. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol, 68: 1109-1113, 2004.

 

59. Caylakli F, Buyuklu F, Cakmak O, Ozdemir H, Ozluoglu LN. Ossifying fibroma of the middle turbinate: A case report. Am J Otolaryngol. Sep-Oct;25(5):377-8, 2004.

 

60. Akkuzu B, Yilmaz I, Cakmak O, Ozluoglu LN. Efficacy of misoprostol in the treatment of tin-nitus in patients with diabetes and/or hypertension. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2004 Sep;31(3):226-32.

 

61. Cakmak O, Celik H, Cankurtaran M, Buyuklu F, Ozgirgin N, Ozluoglu LN. Effects of paranasal sinus ostia and volume on acoustic rhinometry measurements: a model study. J Appl Physiol. 94: 1527-35, 2003.

 

62. Cakmak O, Coşkun M, Çelik H, Buyuklu F, Ozluoglu LN. Value of acoustic rhinometry for measuring nasal valve area. Laryngoscope. 113: 295-302, 2003.

 

63. Cankurtaran M, Çelik H, Cakmak O, Ozluoglu LN. Effects of the nasal valve on acoustic rhi-nometry measurements: a model study. J Appl Physiol. 94: 2166-72, 2003.

 

64. Caylakli F, Cakmak O, Seckin D, Kayaselcuk F, Demirhan B, Ozluoglu LN. Juvenile hyaline fibromatosis: a case report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 67: 557-61, 2003.

 

65. Cakmak O, Yavuz H, Yucel T. Nasal and paranasal sinus schwannomas. Eur Arch Otorhinola-ryngol. 260: 195-7, 2003.

 

66. Cakmak O, Ergin NT. The versatile autogenous costal cartilage graft in septorhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg, 4: 172-176, 2002. (Commentary by Sherris D, 177-179)

 

67. Cakmak O, Çeken I, Seçkin D, Yılmaz İ, Akkuzu B, Özlüoğlu LN. Bullous pemphygoid associated with parotid carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 127: 354-356, 2002.

 

68. Cakmak O, Aydın MV, Ergin NT. Isolated sphenoid sinus adenocarcinoma: A case report. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 259; 266-268, 2002.

 

69. Cakmak O, Ergin NT, Yılmazer C, Kayaselçuk F, Barutçu Ö. Endoscopic removal of esthesioneuroblastoma. A case report. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol, 64; 233-238, 2002.

 

70. Cakmak O, Çelik H, Ergin T, Sennaroglu L. Accuracy of acoustic rhinometry measurements. Laryngoscope 111: 587-594, 2001.

 

71. Cakmak O, Shohet MR, Kern EB. Isolated sphenoid lesions. American Journal of Rhinology, 14: 13-19, 2000.

 

72. Cakmak O, Kutluk T, Akyol MU, Ruacan Ş. Angiocentric lymphoma involving the temporal bone: A rare presentation. European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 256: 262-265, 1999.

Facelift

What is a facelift?

A face lift is an operation performed to apply lifting forces to the lower face and neck in the opposite direction to the ageing vectors in order to improve aging changes, and create youthful appearance.

How is a facelift surgery performed?

The facelift is performed under sedation or general anesthesia. A facelift incision begins horizontally beneath the sideburn, and carried on inferiorly in a native preauricular crease in front of the ear. The incision follows a post-tragal course in females, and a pretragal course in men so as not to move bearded skin into the external ear canal. It is carried on to the back of the ear around the lobule and continued for few centimeters superiorly.  It is then curved posteriorly and inferiorly into the hair bearing portion of the scalp behind the ear. After the incision the skin is raised, a thin muscular layer lying underneath the skin called SMAS is incised, dissected and prepared as a flap. Then the SMAS flap is pulled in a direction opposite to the ageing vectors and suspended with sutures to create the youthful appearance. If neccessary, the concurrent liposuction is performed to remove excess subcutaneous fat, and a corset platysmaplasty is performed through a horizontal submental incision Excess skin is excised, and the skin is sutured.

 

 

 

What are the types of facelift surgery:

 

There are mainly two facelift techniques concerned with the depth and extent of dissection. 

 

1. SMAS lift techniques

 

Imbrication and plication of the SMAS are the most common facelift techniques. Plication techniques involve in-folding of SMAS without any SMAS incision, and suture suspension. Imbrication techniques involve a SMAS incision with or without a limited subSMAS dissection, and suture suspension. Ageing changes in the lower face and neck may be successfully treated with SMAS-lift techniques. Since the retaining ligaments of the midface are not released, these techniques can not improve aging changes at the mid facial region and nasolabial folds.

 

2. Extended facelift techniques

 

Extended facelift techniques involve surgical release of retaining ligaments in the midface that prevent the transmission of traction to the malar portion of the facelift dissection. Advancing the subSMAS dissection toward the midface allow repositioning of the ptotic malar fat, restoring the cheek volume, and  diminishing the nasolabial folds. Extended facelifts produce combined, balanced and harmonious rejuvenation of the midface, cheek and lower face without requiring a separate midface lift procedure. There are different extended facelift techniques with similar extended midface dissection, each with some variation.  A deep plane facelift involves undermining of a skin-SMAS flap as a single unit following a more limited subcutaneous dissection. A composite plane facelift, in addition to the deep plane facelift dissection, the lower part of the orbicularis oculi muscle is also dissected and included in the flap. Since deep and composite flap facelifts involve a single unit, they allow excellent blood supply to overlying skin which is important, especially in smokers, to prevent vascular compromise and subsequent skin necrosis.

 

 

 

Does an extended technique (such as deep or composite plane facelift) would have a more superior result than a classical facelift?

 

There are retaining ligaments on the face anchoring the dermis, subcutaneous fat and SMAS to the bony periosteum or deep fascia. The role of these ligaments to support facial soft tissues against forces of gravity. The attenuation of retaining ligaments with aging leads downward displacement of soft tissues, and responsible for many of the stigmata that occur with aging. Inadequate release of these retaining ligamentous attachments during facelift prevent the transmission of traction toward mid face which may lead to an unbalanced, unnatural appearance with unopposed nasolabial folds. Additional attempts to improve untreated nasolabial folds such as fat grafting to malar region are more likely to result with a “stuffed look”, “operated appearance”. Extended techniques such as deep and composite plane facelifts involving the surgical release of mid facial ligaments produce combined, balanced, and harmonious rejuvenation of the midface, cheek, and lower face without requiring a separate midface lift procedure.

 

 

 

Are deep and composite plane facelifts more dangerous than other type of facelifts?

 

Preservation of the facial nerve is crucial in facelift. It is important that the surgeon understands the relationship of the facial nerve to the anchoring ligaments and the anatomy of the SMAS and subSMAS tissue spaces accurately to perform a safe and successful surgery. Actually, extended techniques such as deep and composite plane facelifts while identifying and preserving the anatomy often leads to lower complication rates than blindly working around vital structures.

 

 

 

Which facelift technique does Dr. Ozcan Cakmak prefer, why?

 

Dr. Ozcan Cakmak prefers his modified composite plane facelift technique which is published in one of the most prestigious journals “Aesthetic Surgery Journal” in 2019. His facelift technique produces combined, balanced, and harmonious rejuvenation of the midface, cheek, and lower face without requiring a separate midface lift procedure

 

 

 

What can I expect after surgery?

 

After surgery pain is minimal to moderate and is usually well managed with pain medications. There would be mailed to moderate swelling and the ecchymosis of the skin, which may differ markedly from patient to patient. The ecchymosis will barely be visible after 4-5 days, and most swelling subsides after 5-7 days. Complete healing will take 6-12 months but the major part of this process is most often completed 1-2 weeks after surgery.

 

 

 

Will I have a drain, bandage or dressing after surgery?

 

Yes, you will have a bandage after surgery wrapped around your head to apply light pressure over the face and neck and to minimize the risk of a blood collection under the skin (hematoma). This bandage, and the drains placed behind the ears to prevent blood from collecting under the skin will be removed a day after the surgery.  Removal of the bandage and the drains are typically pain-free. You will be asked use an elastic bandage for the next few days.

 

 

 

Will I need my sutures to be removed?

 

The sutures are taken out 6-7 days after the surgery. The procedure of suture removal is almost always painless.

 

 

 

Will I have any visible scar?

 

There is no such thing as a scarless surgery and any type of incision on the skin will leave a scar. However, facelift incisions are placed either inside of the hair or in natural creases around the ear. Due to effective camouflage, facelift scars are often not visible or barely discernible.

 

 

 

How long does a the facelift result last?

 

It is not possible to stop the effects of aging and after surgery this process continues. In time your face will age and the effects of surgery will decrease. The aging process is extremely variable among people so it is impossible to tell how long the effects of face lift surgery will last, but it is generally expected that the results of surgery last approximately 10-15 years.

 

 

 

How long will I be off from work?

 

You will be asked to refrain from strenuous exercise for 2-3 weeks, but you may start working 7-10 days after surgery.

 

 

 

Can I wear make-up after surgery?

 

You can start wearing make-up after the third day of surgery.

Lower eyelid blepharoplasty

What is a lower eyelid blepharoplasty?

The lower eyelid blepharoplasty is an operation performed to recreate the a youthful eyelid appearance including re-establishment of the smooth contour at the lower eyelid-cheek junction, elimination of visible fat, effacement of the depressions inherent to their transition, and achievement of even, wrinkle-free skin.

How is a lower blepharoplasty surgery performed?

 

The lower eyelid blepharoplasty can be performed as an outpatient procedure or you may be admitted to the hospital. The operation may be performed under local anesthesia, under sedation or general anesthesia.

 

There are mainly two approaches to treat the lower eyelid:

 

1. Transconjunctival (internal) approach involves an incision on the inside of your lower eyelid. The transconjunctival approach is ideal for young patients that have pseudoherniated fat without excess skin. After the initial incision made inside the lower eyelid, protruding orbital fat is removed or repositioned. Sutures are not necessary for closure.

 

2. The transcutaneous (subcilliary) approach involves an external skin incision placed just under the lower eyelid margin. Transcutaneous approach allows management of excess skin and orbicularis muscle that requires redraping for adequate lid recontouring. It enables broad exposure to extend the dissection for a wide release of retaining ligaments and precise correction of problems such as inferior rim hollowing, malar mounds and festoons. The pseudoherniated fat is often repositioned beyond the infraorbital rim to blend the lower eyelid-cheek junction and prevent hollowness. An orbicularis muscle suspension suture is placed to reinforce the lower eyelid support, and  additional sutures may be used to re-suspend the lower eyelid margin. After final trimming of excess skin, the skin incision is closed with sutures.

 

 

 

What can I expect after lower blepharoplasty?

 

There would be mid to moderate moderate swelling and the ecchymosis of the skin. Cold compresses are frequently applied for the first 48 hours to reduce swelling and ecchymosis. The degree of swelling and ecchymosis differs markedly from patient to patient. Either way the swelling and the ecchymosis both subside within 7-10 days, after which time it is typically hardly notable that you just underwent surgery.

 

 

 

Will I have a bandage or dressing after Lower Blepharoplasty?

 

A bandage is not used after the surgery. A steril strip may be used which is changed or removed after one to three days, and ointment is applied over the suture daily for approximately 1 week in patients with external approach. An eye-drop may be used for approximately 7 days. Artificial tear drops can be prescribed to prevent dryness during the  early postoperative period.

 

 

 

Will I need my sutures to be removed?

 

The skin sutures are removed 5 -7 days after the surgery.

 

 

 

Will I be in pain after the surgery?

 

The lower eyelid blepharoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure. Pain after surgery is typically very mild and well controlled with pain medications. A mild analgesic (non-aspirin containing) is used to control the postoperative discomfort for one to five days.

 

 

 

Will I have any visible scar?

 

There is no such thing as a scarless surgery and any type of incision on the skin will leave a scar. However, subcilliary incision of lower blepharoplasty is very well hidden just below the eyelashes, and often not visible after complete healing.

 

 

 

How long will I be off from work?

 

Generally speaking the recovery period after lower eyelid blepharoplasty is short and you may start doing your daily routines as soon as the first to third day. The swelling and ecchymosis persist rarely longer than few weeks and almost never limits patient mobility.

 

 

 

Can I wear make-up after surgery?

 

You can start wearing make-up 4-5 day after the surgery.

 

 

 

How long can I expect the outcome of surgery to last?

 

It is not possible to stop the effects of aging and after surgery this process continues. In time your face will age and the effects of surgery will decrease. The aging process is extremely variable among people so it is impossible to tell how long the effects of lower blepharoplasty will last, but it is generally expected that the results of surgery last approximately 10-15 years.